Service Desk Compare ticket stub markService Desk Compare

HEAD TO HEAD · RATED SEPTEMBER 2026

Halo vs Ivanti: which IT service desk fits a mid-size team in 2026?

Last reviewed 27 September 2026 · Service Desk Compare reviewers

Halo wins on the business-teams weights and scores at least as high on every criterion.

Totals and ranks on this page use the business-teams weights (five criteria at 20% each; ITIL and CMDB shown for information only). For ITIL and CMDB weighted scores, see the full ITSM ranking.

How do Halo and Ivanti compare on each criterion?

Scroll for more

Halo and Ivanti Neurons for ITSM scores by criterion, editorial assessment, 0 to 10
CriterionWeightHaloIvantiHigher score
ITIL practice coverage
Why these scores

Halo: Incident, problem, change and request management with ITIL-aligned workflows, all in one licence.

Ivanti: 14 ITIL 4-certified practices listed, including configuration, release and deployment, and service level management.

Info only8.59Ivanti
Automation and AI assistance
Why these scores

Halo: The only vendor whose pages document all six lifecycle stages we track, including closure when a requester replies with thanks.

Ivanti: Ticket summaries, classification and routing, knowledge generation and agentic remediation are documented.

20%87.5Halo
Time to value
Why these scores

Halo: A 30-day full-feature trial helps, but the platform spans ITSM, CRM, billing and projects, so scoping takes time.

Ivanti: No public trial or price, and cloud, on-premises and hybrid options usually mean a longer design phase.

20%6.54.5Halo
Configuration management (CMDB)
Why these scores

Halo: Assets and CMDB are included in the single licence rather than sold as an add-on.

Ivanti: Configuration management and IT asset management are certified practices, with less discovery detail published than ServiceNow [ServiceNow CMDB page].

Info only88.5Ivanti
Usability for non-IT requesters
Why these scores

Halo: An end-user virtual agent works across web chat, Teams, Slack and the self-service portal.

Ivanti: A virtual agent, chatbots and self-service portals are documented.

20%76.5Halo
Integrations
Why these scores

Halo: Halo states over 250 native integrations.

Ivanti: Hybrid deployment suits connections to on-premises systems; the integration catalogue size is not published.

20%87Halo
Pricing transparency
Why these scores

Halo: One published per-agent price with no tiers or bolt-ons; the US dollar figure sits behind a currency selector.

Ivanti: No public pricing; contact sales.

20%92Halo

Halo scores higher on 5 criteria, Ivanti on 0, and 0 are tied among the five scored criteria.

How much do Halo and Ivanti cost?

Halo

Halo published pricing
PlanPriceWhat changes
One plan£66 per agent/monthBilled annually. UK list price; the page offers a currency selector for other regions. Named or concurrent licences at the same price.
Halo Enterprise Package$1M a yearUnlimited licences and funded implementation, fixed price.
Trial30 daysAll features and modules.

Source: Halo pricing

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM published pricing
PlanPriceWhat changes
All plansNot publishedContact sales.

Source: G2 comparison page: 'No pricing publicly available'

Which ticket stages does each one automate?

Lifecycle Automation Census: documented automation by ticket stageHalo documents automation at 6 of six stages, with 0 partial.01Logged✓DocumentedEnd-user virtual agenttriages and logsrequests on chat,Teams, Slack and02Categorised✓DocumentedAI suggestions forcategorisation andprioritisation03Routed✓DocumentedAI suggestions forteam routing andSLA-breach warnings04Resolved✓DocumentedProcess agentsauto-resolve knownissues05Closed✓DocumentedA requester'sthank-you reply isread as resolution06Reviewed✓DocumentedTicket records turnedinto standardisedknowledge
What each vendor's public pages document for each stage, as read on 27 Sep 2026. 'Not documented' means we did not find it on the pages we read, not that the product cannot do it.

Scroll for more

Lifecycle Automation Census for Halo, as a table
StageStatusNote
01 LoggedDocumentedEnd-user virtual agent triages and logs requests on chat, Teams, Slack and portal Source
02 CategorisedDocumentedAI suggestions for categorisation and prioritisation Source
03 RoutedDocumentedAI suggestions for team routing and SLA-breach warnings Source
04 ResolvedDocumentedProcess agents auto-resolve known issues Source
05 ClosedDocumentedA requester's thank-you reply is read as resolution Source
06 ReviewedDocumentedTicket records turned into standardised knowledge Source
Lifecycle Automation Census: documented automation by ticket stageIvanti Neurons for ITSM documents automation at 5 of six stages, with 0 partial.01Logged✓DocumentedVirtual agent,chatbots andself-service portals02Categorised✓DocumentedAutomaticallyclassifies incomingtickets03Routed✓DocumentedRoutes tickets to theright team04Resolved✓DocumentedAgentic AI detects andremediates issues05ClosedNot documented06Reviewed✓DocumentedKnowledge articlesgenerated fromresolved incidents
What each vendor's public pages document for each stage, as read on 27 Sep 2026. 'Not documented' means we did not find it on the pages we read, not that the product cannot do it.

Scroll for more

Lifecycle Automation Census for Ivanti Neurons for ITSM, as a table
StageStatusNote
01 LoggedDocumentedVirtual agent, chatbots and self-service portals Source
02 CategorisedDocumentedAutomatically classifies incoming tickets Source
03 RoutedDocumentedRoutes tickets to the right team Source
04 ResolvedDocumentedAgentic AI detects and remediates issues Source
05 ClosedNot documented
06 ReviewedDocumentedKnowledge articles generated from resolved incidents Source

What each vendor's public pages document for each stage, as read on 27 Sep 2026. 'Not documented' means we did not find it on the pages we read, not that the product cannot do it.

When should you choose Halo?

Choose Halo if pricing transparency and time to value matter most to your team. It scores 9 and 6.5 there, against Ivanti's 2 and 4.5. One published per-agent price with no tiers or bolt-ons; the US dollar figure sits behind a currency selector. We list it as best for: teams that want every module in one per-agent licence. Read the Halo review

When should you choose Ivanti?

Ivanti does not score higher than Halo on any of the five scored criteria. Choose it for reasons outside our scores, such as fit with tools you already run. We list it as best for: organisations that must run ITSM on-premises or hybrid with certified ITIL practices. Read the Ivanti Neurons for ITSM review

What do buyers ask about Halo and Ivanti?

Which is better overall, Halo or Ivanti?

On the business-teams weights, Halo scores 7.7 and Ivanti 5.5 out of 10, ranking 5 and 9 of 9 on the business-teams ranking. Halo leads on 5 criteria and Ivanti on 0.

Which is cheaper, Halo or Ivanti?

Halo lists £66 per agent per month (UK list, annual); Ivanti lists Not published. Ivanti does not publish prices, so a direct comparison needs a quote [Ivanti page]. Pricing units differ (per agent, per seat or per technician), so compare the plan that includes the practices you need. On pricing transparency Halo scores 9 and Ivanti 2. The calculator prices both for your agent count.

Which has the deeper ITIL coverage and CMDB?

On ITIL practice coverage Halo scores 8.5 and Ivanti 9; on configuration management (CMDB) Halo scores 8 and Ivanti 8.5. Configuration management and IT asset management are certified practices, with less discovery detail published than ServiceNow [ServiceNow CMDB page].

Where next?